Re: Questions about VMG

"ZhangXin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.megaco
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Christian,
Thanks.
Do we need to define a "major VMG" in a physical MG? I think all the VMGs in one physical MG are equal. Am I right?

Regards,
Sean
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Christian Groves" <[email protected]>
To: "ZhangXin" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Megaco] Questions about VMG


> Hello Sean,
> 
> VMG gives the possibility of different network architectures. Depending
> on the customer's network and vendor's offering, VMGs may reduce the cost.
> 
> Regards, Christian
> 
> ZhangXin wrote:
>> Hi Christian,
>> thank you for your prompt reply.
>> I am wondering if the primary purpose of VMG is to reduce the cost for gateway facility?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sean
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Christian Groves" <[email protected]>
>> To: "ZhangXin" <[email protected]>
>> Cc: <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 8:56 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Megaco] Questions about VMG
>>
>>
>>   
>>> Hello Sean,
>>>
>>> Please see CNG below.
>>>
>>> Regards, Christian
>>>
>>> ZhangXin wrote:
>>>     
>>>> Hi list,
>>>> I have 2 questions in H.248, can someone help me?
>>>> 1. In H.248.1 V2 chap.11.1, why we need to divide a Physical MG to one
>>>> or more virtual MGs? What is the advantage of VMG? Only because some
>>>> VMGS can share some hardware and software resource?
>>>>       
>>> [CNG] It allows multiple MGCs to use the same physical MG. Without the
>>> VMG concept there is a one to one relationship between the a
>>> MGC/Physical MG.
>>>     
>>>> 2. Can a physical MG be divided to a TG(trunk gateway) and an
>>>> AG(access gateway)?
>>>>       
>>> [CNG] Yes, these would be two separate VMGs running an applicable profile.
>>>     
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Sean
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Megaco mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco
>>>>   
>>>>       
>> >
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.