Re: Megaco message
"Raphael Tryster" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.megaco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I agree with you. There may be a place in the market for products that support both Megaco and MGCP in the same load, but I don't think this is the way to do it! Raphael ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tamar Nemet Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 10:18 AM To: [email protected] Cc: Anat Garber Subject: [Megaco] Megaco message Hi, As much as I know the following Megaco command is illegal, am I correct ? !/1 [10.100.4.28]:2944 T=9608{C=680399{MF=eph_2291{M{O{MO=SR},L{v=0 c=IN IP4 $ m=audio $ RTP/AVP 8 a=ptime:20 },R{v=0 o=- 1845908136 0 IN IP4 10.20.21.104 s=- c=IN IP4 10.20.21.104 t=0 0 m=audio 4050 RTP/AVP 8 . 200 62305 OK }}}}} It looks that in the end of the remote SDP there is reply for MGCP message and as much as I know this is wrong message, is it true ? Thanks for your help, Tamar ********************************************************************************************** IMPORTANT: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential. They are intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager or the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to anyone or make copies thereof. *** eSafe scanned this email for viruses, vandals, and malicious content. *** ********************************************************************************************** _______________________________________________ Megaco mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco