Re: Multiple Streams and mutiplex terminations
Christian Groves <[email protected]> Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:23:31 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.megaco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Javi, I'm not aware of any SDP that would allow you to specify the TEI and SAPI. Probably the closest draft to doing this was Tom's draft http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-taylor-mmusic-sdp-tdm-01.txt. Rather than use SDP you probably need to create a new package with two properties that allow you to indicate the SAPI and TEI. Each property would be a sub-list allowing you to indicate with SAPIs and TEIs apply to the stream. You probably wouldn't need multiple StreamIDs in this case. Regards, Christian On 25/10/2011 10:51 PM, Javi Muñoz wrote: > Hello Christian, > > Thank you for your answer. > > I understand MeGaCo syntax doesn't support adding streams in the > multiplex descriptor neither including N in the multiplex descriptor. > > [Christian] A little, I understand the termination aspect. I'm still > not sure about the streams. I don't understand how you can have > multiple H.248 streams for the circuit termination TermA and TermB? > With what information element (i.e. property) do you assign the SAPI > and TEI to a Stream? What properties distinguish the Nx64K termination > from a HDLCW1 one? > [Christian] I'm not 100% sure what you're trying to do but if you're > only using a single Termination to represent each D-channel and a > single Termination for the HDLCPW it seems to me that you don't need a > mux termination and that it may be sufficient to simply use a property > to assign TEIs to Streams (or Terminations). > [Christian] I think you're trying to solve this at a different level > than what it should be. The multiplex descriptor describe the > multiplex of terminations used to make up a stream. It doesn't > describe what's happening at a stream level itself. We have the Stream > Descriptor with associated (Local, Remote, LocalControl descriptors) > to do this. > > > In ISDN, each D-channel (channel of 16 or 64 kbps) transport multiple > flows muliplexed by its TEI and SAPI in the Q.921 header. > > Every of these flows may need to be transported to a different server > in the IP network, and each server may receive only a HDLCPW. So, I > need to multiplex multiple D-channel flows in each HDLCPW. In each > HDLCPW, each flow would be distinguished by its TEI/SAPI and D-channel > identifier. > > I can not think how to describe in SDP (Local, Remote, LocalControl > descriptors) what D-channel flows must be transported by any HDLCPW. > May you proposed an example? > > Regards, > > Javier Muñoz >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Javi Muñoz >>>> >>>> >>>> El 20/10/2011 11:12, Christian Groves escribió: >>>>> Hello Javi, >>>>> >>>>> Did you see my email on the 18/10 which discusses this? Even with >>>>> the clarification of the Terminations there's some questions. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, Christian >>>>> >>>>> On 20/10/2011 7:38 PM, Javi Muñoz wrote: >>>>>> Does MeGaCo support the next contexts?: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Tmux1=Mux(1x64K(TermA/StreamID=1,TermA/StreamID=2,TermB/StreamID=1)) >>>>>> -- * -- TermC (HDLCPW1) >>>>>> | >>>>>> TermA (ISDN D-Channel, UNI p) | >>>>>> StreamID=1 (SAPI 16, TEI r)------| >>>>>> StreamID=2 (SAPI 16, TEI s)------| >>>>>> | >>>>>> TermB (ISDN D-Channel, UNI q) | >>>>>> StreamID=1 (SAPI 16, TEI r)------| >>>>>> StreamID=2 (SAPI 16, TEI s)------------| >>>>>> StreamID=3 (SAPI 16, TEI t)------------| >>>>>> | >>>>>> >>>>>> Tmux2=Mux(1x64K(TermB/StreamID=2,TermB/StreamID=3) -- * -- TermD >>>>>> (HDLCPW2) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> where: >>>>>> >>>>>> (a) Every multiplex termination is multiplexing Streams from >>>>>> different ISDN terminations, and only any Streams of each >>>>>> termination. >>>>>> >>>>>> (b) The result of the multiplexion must be a flow of "64 kbps". >>>>>> >>>>>> Javi Muñoz >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Megaco mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Megaco mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> > > _______________________________________________ > Megaco mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco >