RE: Some extensions to STUN.

"Christian Huitema" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.midcom
Message-ID <DAC3FCB50E31C54987CD10797DA511BA0246F2EF@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
> One is testing to see if they rewrite data inside the payload of a UDP
> packet. NATs have been observed that rewrite the mapped address inside the
> stun packet. Multiple people have suggested a solution to this - an
> extension that returned an encrypted (mostly likely with xor) form of the
> the mapped address with some predefined key would detect this.

We did observe that behavior in some NATs during the testing of Teredo, and incorporated an XOR protection in Teredo. I suggested to incorporate the same fix in STUN, but I was overruled by my co-authors.
 
-- Christian Huitema
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.