Re: call for consensus on proposed semantic change

Hi all,

I do not support the change, so my answer is NO.

  Martin

--On Sonntag, 21. November 2004 10:22 Uhr -0500 Melinda Shore 
<[email protected]> wrote:

| There's been some discussion about whether or not midcom's semantics
| should be changed so that the PER and PRR inputs would contain hop-by-
| hop descriptions rather than end-to-end descriptions.  If you support
| this change please post "yes" to the mailing list; if you do not support
| this change please post "no."
|
| The change would be reflected in changes to the existing MIB draft but
| not to the published semantics RFC.
|
| Thanks,
|
| Melinda
|
|
| _______________________________________________
| midcom mailing list
| [email protected]
| https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom