Re: Action item from yesterday's meeting

I have not been participating closely I the group so I may have a complete
clueless opinion here but ... It seems that people are continuing to deploy
things like twice NAT, if we can make the protocol work in these cases
without causing major complexity or big issues to the protocol, why wouldn't
we? It seemed to me that Srisuresh was proposing that a few simple changes
could make the protocol be about the same in the case we currently have plus
make it usable for a few more cases.


On 11/16/04 10:19 AM, "Melinda Shore" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm intending to get this issue closed in the next week (or sooner,
> if possible).  Juergen and Suresh have presented their concerns, and
> if there are other people who have opinions or questions or even
> just want to indicate how they're leaning, that would be a big help.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Melinda
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> midcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom