Re: draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-05

Lo and behold your cry for intended status change will happen!

Actually, this came up earlier because 1) the I-D makes a normative 
referecence to an informational RFC5014 and 2) API documents are 
informational in general. It just did not make to the latest revision..

- JOuni

6/29/2016, 9:07 AM, Behcet Sarikaya kirjoitti:
>  Hi all,
>
> I quickly looked at this draft.
> It seems like the authors or Danny changed "sustained IP address" to
> "session lasting IP address". It sounds a bit better.
> However, my concerns about sustained IP address remain the same on the
> session lasting IP address because semantically they mean the same
> thing, the session lasting is just a more flashy name.
>
> I really don't understand how in the world this draft became a WG
> draft in the first place. Given that, my suggestion is to finish up
> this work by changing it to Informational. I don't believe it is
> implementable.
>
> This draft is also not the type of draft dmm should be working on, dmm
> I think is a continuation of MIP related mobility WGs and this draft
> has nothing to do with this.
>
> Make it Informational, folks.
>
> Behcet
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>