Re: draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-05
Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mip6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAC8QAcd8oGOteuEtfATY=FYN-KE8RZRqJprex-NxCUH3WRTwoA__25733.0847475261$1467231172$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]> wrote: > Lo and behold your cry for intended status change will happen! > Lo I just now checked it. I could not see any API development in dmm charter. Aren't you responsible for this? Regards, Behcet > Actually, this came up earlier because 1) the I-D makes a normative > referecence to an informational RFC5014 and 2) API documents are > informational in general. It just did not make to the latest revision.. > > - JOuni > > > 6/29/2016, 9:07 AM, Behcet Sarikaya kirjoitti: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I quickly looked at this draft. >> It seems like the authors or Danny changed "sustained IP address" to >> "session lasting IP address". It sounds a bit better. >> However, my concerns about sustained IP address remain the same on the >> session lasting IP address because semantically they mean the same >> thing, the session lasting is just a more flashy name. >> >> I really don't understand how in the world this draft became a WG >> draft in the first place. Given that, my suggestion is to finish up >> this work by changing it to Informational. I don't believe it is >> implementable. >> >> This draft is also not the type of draft dmm should be working on, dmm >> I think is a continuation of MIP related mobility WGs and this draft >> has nothing to do with this. >> >> Make it Informational, folks. >> >> Behcet >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dmm mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >> >