Re: draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-05

     o Exposing mobility state to mobile nodes and network nodes:
       define solutions that allow, for example, mobile nodes to select
       either a care-of address or a home address depending on an
       application' mobility needs. In order to enable this

To me it is there..

       functionality, the network-side control functions and other
       networking nodes must also be able to exchange appropriate
       control information, as well as to the mobile nodes and their
       applications.

And again here.

If apps or mobile node need to be able to select appropriate address I 
find it ok to describe it.. call it api or not in the charter.

- Jouni



6/29/2016, 1:12 PM, Behcet Sarikaya kirjoitti:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Lo and behold your cry for intended status change will happen!
>>
>
>
> Lo I just now checked it.
> I could not see any API development in dmm charter.
>
> Aren't you responsible for this?
>
> Regards,
>
> Behcet
>> Actually, this came up earlier because 1) the I-D makes a normative
>> referecence to an informational RFC5014 and 2) API documents are
>> informational in general. It just did not make to the latest revision..
>>
>
>
>> - JOuni
>>
>>
>> 6/29/2016, 9:07 AM, Behcet Sarikaya kirjoitti:
>>>
>>>  Hi all,
>>>
>>> I quickly looked at this draft.
>>> It seems like the authors or Danny changed "sustained IP address" to
>>> "session lasting IP address". It sounds a bit better.
>>> However, my concerns about sustained IP address remain the same on the
>>> session lasting IP address because semantically they mean the same
>>> thing, the session lasting is just a more flashy name.
>>>
>>> I really don't understand how in the world this draft became a WG
>>> draft in the first place. Given that, my suggestion is to finish up
>>> this work by changing it to Informational. I don't believe it is
>>> implementable.
>>>
>>> This draft is also not the type of draft dmm should be working on, dmm
>>> I think is a continuation of MIP related mobility WGs and this draft
>>> has nothing to do with this.
>>>
>>> Make it Informational, folks.
>>>
>>> Behcet
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dmm mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>>>
>>