Re: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-04: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <[email protected]> Thu, 3 Aug 2017 10:38:32 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mip6
Message-ID <D5A643CC-8122-4382-B126-EDCFC9AF9BFA__29426.5776676641$1501796236$gmane$org@nostrum.com>
Thanks, your response resolves all my comments.

Ben.

> On Aug 3, 2017, at 3:30 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : Ben Campbell [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Envoyé : jeudi 3 août 2017 00:14
>> À : The IESG
>> Cc : [email protected]; Jouni Korhonen; dmm-
>> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
>> Objet : Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-04: (with
>> COMMENT)
>> 
>> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-04: No Objection
>> 
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
>> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
>> paragraph, however.)
>> 
>> 
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>> 
>> 
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> I have a few editorial comments/nits:
>> 
>> - There are several acronyms that should be expanded on first mention.
>> (including at least a couple that are expanded on _second_ mention (MAG and
>> LMA).
>> 
>> - 3.2, "Per-packet management" bullet: The second sentence does not make
>> sense.
>> 
> 
> This sentence will be removed
> 
>> - 3.2, last paragraph: Are we really talking about the latency introduced by per-
>> packet management, or jitter (i.e. variation in latency)?
>> 
> 
> We are talking about jitter. It will be clarified in next release.
> 
>> - 4.1, definition of "Interface Label": This doesn't really define the term "interface
>> label". It talks about how it is used, but not what it represents.
>> 
> 
> You're right... We will add definition of interface label in the terminology section.

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm