Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-04: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-04: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I have a few editorial comments/nits:

- There are several acronyms that should be expanded on first mention.
(including at least a couple that are expanded on _second_ mention (MAG and
LMA).

- 3.2, "Per-packet management" bullet: The second sentence does not make sense.

- 3.2, last paragraph: Are we really talking about the latency introduced by
per-packet management, or jitter (i.e. variation in latency)?

- 4.1, definition of "Interface Label": This doesn't really define the term
"interface label". It talks about how it is used, but not what it represents.