Re: Do we really need TCP/DTLS/SCTP proto field?
Christer Holmberg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mmusic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, Note that the mechanism is also used at least by CLUE, which does not mandate ICE (or JSEP). Regards, Christer From: mmusic [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Eric Rescorla Sent: 16 February 2017 17:44 To: mmusic WG <[email protected]>; Ben Campbell <[email protected]> Subject: [MMUSIC] Do we really need TCP/DTLS/SCTP proto field? I raised this with the authors, but maybe it is worth asking the mailing list. It seems like we are trending towards a world where we just ignore the transport component of the proto field and let ICE work things out. In that vein, I wonder do we really need to register/define TCP/DTLS/SCTP. It's only really useful if we think people will do SCTP over DTLS with TCP without ICE. Is that actually likely. I note that per previous discussions, JSEP already requires that you use UDP/DTLS/SCTP all the time: http://rtcweb-wg.github.io/jsep/#rfc.section.5.1.2 -Ekr _______________________________________________ mmusic mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic