Re: Do we really need TCP/DTLS/SCTP proto field?
"Ben Campbell" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mmusic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Process background: draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp was on today's IESG telechat. The draft is approved for publication, but with a point raised to ask the WG resolve Ekr's question. Thanks! Ben. On 16 Feb 2017, at 9:43, Eric Rescorla wrote: > I raised this with the authors, but maybe it is worth asking the > mailing > list. > > It seems like we are trending towards a world where we just ignore the > transport > component of the proto field and let ICE work things out. In that > vein, I > wonder > do we really need to register/define TCP/DTLS/SCTP. It's only really > useful > if > we think people will do SCTP over DTLS with TCP without ICE. Is that > actually > likely. I note that per previous discussions, JSEP already requires > that > you use > UDP/DTLS/SCTP all the time: > http://rtcweb-wg.github.io/jsep/#rfc.section.5.1.2 > > -Ekr _______________________________________________ mmusic mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic