Re: Do we really need TCP/DTLS/SCTP proto field?
Roman Shpount <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mmusic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAD5OKxt4mBZ=RaLheOuZCp2TZuhiNZ1E9a86NL8TQ1U2kGsZeQ@mail.gmail.com> |
The way ICE is currently defined, ICE enabled end points are supposed to send a re-INVITE after nomination process is completed with the selected candidate address in the m= line. So, if tcp candidate is selected, re-INVITE must be sent with TCP/DTLS/SCTP in the m= line. Also, any offers/answers after the ICE nomination is complete, are supposed to send the currently selected candidate in the m= line, which will also be TCP/DTLS/SCTP in case tcp candidate is selected. Based on all of this, I would strongly suggest to keep TCP/DTLS/SCTP. Regards, _____________ Roman Shpount On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Christer Holmberg < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > > > My suggestion is to keep the TCP/DTLS/SCTP definition. > > > > We earlier made a choice to restrict the scope of the document (by > removing plain SCTP and DTLS-over-SCTP proto values), and I think we should > keep the current scope. > > > > Regards, > > > > Christer > > > > > > *From:* mmusic [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Ben > Campbell > *Sent:* 16 February 2017 17:52 > *To:* Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> > *Cc:* mmusic WG <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [MMUSIC] Do we really need TCP/DTLS/SCTP proto field? > > > > Process background: draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp was on today's IESG > telechat. The draft is approved for publication, but with a point raised to > ask the WG resolve Ekr's question. > > Thanks! > > Ben. > > On 16 Feb 2017, at 9:43, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > I raised this with the authors, but maybe it is worth asking the mailing > list. > > > > It seems like we are trending towards a world where we just ignore the > transport > > component of the proto field and let ICE work things out. In that vein, I > wonder > > do we really need to register/define TCP/DTLS/SCTP. It's only really > useful if > > we think people will do SCTP over DTLS with TCP without ICE. Is that > actually > > likely. I note that per previous discussions, JSEP already requires that > you use > > UDP/DTLS/SCTP all the time: http://rtcweb-wg.github. > io/jsep/#rfc.section.5.1.2 > > > > -Ekr > > > > > _______________________________________________ > mmusic mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic > > _______________________________________________ mmusic mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic