Re: it's time to expel SDP from our lives
Christer Holmberg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mmusic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <D566F4E1.1E4EA%[email protected]> |
…and, just to clarify: I do NOT suggest SDP 2.0 :) On 14/06/17 14:05, "mmusic on behalf of Christer Holmberg" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > >>>It may be possible to transition a large section of real-time media away >>> from SDP. But the way to argue for that is to present the outline of a >>> technical replacement >> >>As said in a previous comments, there is no need for a SDP >>replacement. Nobody is asking for SDP 2.0 but, instead, "define the >>multimedia parameters and let me signal them in my preferred way". > >Well, in order to have interoperability, people need to have a common >preferred way. That¹s why we do standardisation. > >In WebRTC, if people download the same web site, they will automatically >get the same parameter signalling mechanism, no matter whether it¹s >standardised or not. But, if people download different web each may come >with different mechanisms, in which case they won¹t interop. > >Regards, > >Christer > >_______________________________________________ >mmusic mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic