Re: it's time to expel SDP from our lives
Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mmusic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALiegfnnXOYxHhsB_SewU2XqNGd_+LAWwsBuw8U5kKBW5Of07g@mail.gmail.com> |
2017-06-14 13:05 GMT+02:00 Christer Holmberg <[email protected]>: >>As said in a previous comments, there is no need for a SDP >>replacement. Nobody is asking for SDP 2.0 but, instead, "define the >>multimedia parameters and let me signal them in my preferred way". > > Well, in order to have interoperability, people need to have a common > preferred way. That¹s why we do standardisation. And that's why SDP already exists. But that does not mean that we need that WebRTC is SDP based. > In WebRTC, if people download the same web site, they will automatically > get the same parameter signalling mechanism, no matter whether it¹s > standardised or not. But, if people download different web each may come > with different mechanisms, in which case they won¹t interop. Sure, but I'm talking about that. I just focus on the communication between the JS application and the browser's WebRTC engine, which is made via JS API by exchanging SDP blobs. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ mmusic mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic