Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5939 (5042)
Cullen Jennings <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mmusic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On Jun 16, 2017, at 10:05 AM, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5939, > "Session Description Protocol (SDP) Capability Negotiation". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5042 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Typo in example <[email protected]> > > Section: 4.2 > > Original Text > ------------- > m=audio 59000 UDP/TLS/RTP/AVP 98 > > Corrected Text > -------------- > m=audio 59000 UDP/TLS/RTP/SAVP 98 > > Notes > ----- > The example missed an S in the mine type. The list of allowed types is at https://www.iana.org/assignments/sdp-parameters/sdp-parameters.xhtml#sdp-parameters-2 and UDP/TLS/RTP/AVP is not a registered device. Because this is over TLS, it is a SRTP (not RTP) and should use SAVP not AVP. > > I have no idea how I cut and paste in mine type there. I should have put "proto" not "mine type". Sorry