Re: Issue 59: Editorial comments from Tero (was: Comments of draft-ietf-mobike-protocol-04.txt)

[email protected] writes:
> > 6)
> > 
> > Perhaps the section 4.7 should also mention that DPD packets can
> > also include UPDATE_SA_ADDRESSES in case the initiator suspects
> > that the NAT mapping has changed, and that will save one round
> > trip.
> 
> Hmm, yes, I had intended to include that already in -03, but
> somehow that was forgotten. How about adding this to the 3rd
> paragraph?
> 
>    If the initiator suspects that the NAT mapping has changed,  
>    it MAY also skip the detection step and send UPDATE_SA_ADDRESSES 
>    immediately. This saves one roundtrip if the NAT mapping 
>    has indeed changed.   

Sounds good. 
-- 
[email protected]