Re: Issue 59: Editorial comments from Tero (was: Comments of draft-ietf-mobike-protocol-04.txt)

[trying to now answer via separate emails]

[email protected] writes:
> > 4)
> > 
> > The last sentence in the section 4.5 should say
> > 
> >     Similarly, a simple "VPN gateway" that has only a single
> >     address, and is not going to change it, does not need to send
> >     or process ADDITIONAL_*_ADDRESS notifications.
> > 
> > It needs to understand them so much it can ignore them.
> 
> Yes, but that's already required by IKEv2 ("Notify payloads 
> with status types ... MUST be ignored if not recognized.").

Yes, but as we are working over IKEv2, we can also change some of the
requirements, just wanted to make sure that we are not going to lower
that restriction specified in the IKEv2 document here.  
-- 
[email protected]