Re: Issue: Support for IPv4 - IPv6 movements (#13)
Stephen Kent <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <p06110410bd00d6c7fa38@[128.89.89.75]> |
At 8:30 PM +0200 6/24/04, Francis Dupont wrote: > In your previous mail you wrote: > > > => I believe that there is a real problem but the problem is partially > > outside the scope of MOBIKE. I propose to *not* require the support > > of multiple simultaneous outer addresses for IPsec SA without a strong > > support from the IPsec WG (as something specific in the 2401bis for > > instance). > > I miss something here. > >=> the key word is "simultaneous" > > I thought RFC 3554 has the support of the IPsec WG. > >=> I am afraid many members of the IPsec WG didn't understand all >consequences of RFC 3554. And if I am wrong (I'd like to be) there >is or will be clarification in the 2401bis... 2401bis already mandates support for selector sets that allow a single SA to refer to a set of IP addresses and ports, which is one of the major requirements for SCTP that was not available under 2401. What else do you feel needs to be covered to enable SCTP to work? Steve