Re: Issue: NAT-T interaction (#3)

Francis Dupont <[email protected]> Thu, 24 Jun 2004 23:59:39 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.mobike
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   > and the IPsec WG decided to forbid direct no-NAT-T to NAT-T transition.
   > 
   That does not mean we cannot explore a similar thing in this WG :-)
   MOBIKE is about mobility unlike NAT-T.  

=> I disagree: the difference between NAT-T and MOBIKE is not mobility
but multi-homing, i.e., not address change but the reacher support of
multiple addresses.

Regards

[email protected]