Re: Closing some less controversial issues

[email protected] wrote:

> I think we should close some of the less controversial 
> issues on the issues list. These have been discussed on the 
> mailing list and meetings, and I think we have a rough
> consensus on them. 
> 
> If you disagree, please tell so within a week or so.
> 
> Issue 2: "Is simultaneous movement of both parties supported?"
> 
>    "No; both parties can be mobile, but simultaneous 
>    movement is not supported."

What mechanism will be used to ensure that only one end moves at a time? 
If you cannot ensure it, what happens _when_ it happens?

> Issue 9: "Does MOBIKE require RFC2401bis?"
> 
>    "IKEv2 requires RFC2401bis, and MOBIKE requires IKEv2."
> 
> Issue 7: "Do we support tunnel mode only, or tunnel mode first and
> transport later, or both by same document?"
> 
>    "First document will consider only tunnel mode."

IMO, it would be more useful to support transport mode than tunnel mode. 
(reasons in draft-touch-ipsec-vpn)

> Issue 13: "Does switching from IPv4 to IPv6 or vice versa work?
> Presumably only for tunnel mode?" 
> 
>    "Changing from IPv4 to IPv6 or vice versa should work 
>    for tunnel mode at least."
> 
> Cheers,
> Pasi (as issues list maintainer)
> _______________________________________________
> Mobike mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.machshav.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mobike

_______________________________________________
Mobike mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.machshav.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mobike

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD4DBQFBEs7OE5f5cImnZrsRAuqUAJwM+qOU1XIgkDmuocVVtKP8l4VFFACY8GsE
ZlOWVileoP7f+ZCjg12flg==
=inlK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----