Closing some less controversial issues
Tero Kivinen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] writes: > Issue 2: "Is simultaneous movement of both parties supported?" > > "No; both parties can be mobile, but simultaneous > movement is not supported." > > Issue 9: "Does MOBIKE require RFC2401bis?" > > "IKEv2 requires RFC2401bis, and MOBIKE requires IKEv2." > > Issue 7: "Do we support tunnel mode only, or tunnel mode first and > transport later, or both by same document?" > > "First document will consider only tunnel mode." > > Issue 13: "Does switching from IPv4 to IPv6 or vice versa work? > Presumably only for tunnel mode?" > > "Changing from IPv4 to IPv6 or vice versa should work > for tunnel mode at least." I agree to closing all these issues. -- [email protected]