Re: Closing some less controversial issues
Francis Dupont <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In your previous mail you wrote: > Issue 2: "Is simultaneous movement of both parties supported?" > > "No; both parties can be mobile, but simultaneous > movement is not supported." What mechanism will be used to ensure that only one end moves at a time? => none. If you cannot ensure it, what happens _when_ it happens? => message exchange failure, timeout and full reset of everything. > Issue 7: "Do we support tunnel mode only, or tunnel mode first and > transport later, or both by same document?" > > "First document will consider only tunnel mode." IMO, it would be more useful to support transport mode than tunnel mode. (reasons in draft-touch-ipsec-vpn) => I understand your reasons but transport mode of tunnels is a bit special and should be handled by specifics mechanisms... Can we talk about this later and/or off-line? Regards [email protected]