Re: Closing some less controversial issues

Francis Dupont wrote:

>  In your previous mail you wrote:
> 
>    > Issue 2: "Is simultaneous movement of both parties supported?"
>    > 
>    >    "No; both parties can be mobile, but simultaneous 
>    >    movement is not supported."
>    
>    What mechanism will be used to ensure that only one end moves at a time? 
> 
> => none.
> 
>    If you cannot ensure it, what happens _when_ it happens?
>    
> => message exchange failure, timeout and full reset of everything.

Thanks. My apologies for jumping in without a huge amount of context, 
and thanks for the answer. So long as it's handled, not defined-away ;-)

>    > Issue 7: "Do we support tunnel mode only, or tunnel mode first and
>    > transport later, or both by same document?"
>    > 
>    >    "First document will consider only tunnel mode."
>    
>    IMO, it would be more useful to support transport mode than tunnel mode. 
>    (reasons in draft-touch-ipsec-vpn)
>    
> => I understand your reasons but transport mode of tunnels is a bit
> special and should be handled by specifics mechanisms...
> Can we talk about this later and/or off-line?

Sure. Again, just concerned about the statement, and glad it's handled 
already.

> Regards
> 
> [email protected]

_______________________________________________
Mobike mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.machshav.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mobike

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBEvO5E5f5cImnZrsRAqpUAKCDxEgyDVSTvLL2nX1pS67gJSIMNQCgnkoq
iDyUHJmv1XgjRIts4MKRdcs=
=ny4+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----