Re: New issue 16: No packets from other end?
Francis Dupont <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In your previous mail you wrote: Do you mean that lack of ESP packets would trigger an IKEv2 informational request and lack of response to that would trigger MOBIKE to change paths, or that lack of ESP packets would directly trigger MOBIKE to change paths? => this is exactly the kind of questions we should avoid: the lack of ESP packets should be reported (not by MOBIKE but by IPsec itself) to the control which can ask to MOBIKE to trigger an IKEv2 informational request or to change paths. The control mechanism can be inside or outside the MOBIKE tool but should NOT be defined by MOBIKE. As a Mobile IPv6 implementor I can say that handoff detection is not so easy and I definitively don't want to get it in my IKE daemon code or in MOBIKE specs. Just ask Jari... Regards [email protected]