RE: New issue 16: No packets from other end?
Tero Kivinen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] writes: > Do you mean that lack of ESP packets would trigger an IKEv2 > informational request and lack of response to that would trigger > MOBIKE to change paths, or that lack of ESP packets > would directly trigger MOBIKE to change paths? The first. I.e. we need to still do the dead peer detection to verify if it just so that the other end is simply silent. -- [email protected]