Re: New issue 16: No packets from other end?

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   > => IMHO this is a dangerous path to follow because it shall give
   > a monster for the MOBIKE/IKEv2 tool. I understand you are more interested
   > by MOBIKE SGs than by more generic mobile/multi-homed boxes where
   > MOBIKE is only a small part of the whole thing but please don't
   > specialize MOBIKE as some are always trying to specialize IPsec to VPNs.
   
   This is a good point.
   
   One way to look at this is to talk about what observations
   must be supported by a MOBIKE implementation and what
   observations are optional. For instance, local knowledge

=> I don't know what you call "local knowledge".

   could still be allowed even if MOBIKE/IKEv2/IPsec was

=> MOBIKE should not specify anything about IPsec itself,
i.e., it should be a hint in the design document only.

   mandated to deliver observations about problems. Or are
   you suggesting that local knowledge would be mandatory
   and 'lack of packets' optional?
   
Regards

[email protected]