Re: New issue 16: No packets from other end?

Jari Arkko <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mobike
Organization None
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Francis,

>       (2) Its not okay. MOBIKE/IKEv2/IPsec should fail and
>           wait for the rest of the stack to inform when there's
>           again an operational address.
>    
>           If problems on the path need to be handled, this would
>           imply the development of a new, separate protocol for
>           testing paths. Note that ICMP/TCP/app may already have
>           told us of a problem with the current communications just
>           as DPD did. But what we need is finding _another_ pair
>           that works. No protocol that I know does that right now.
>           Most of what we have in IPv6/DNA etc is focused on local
>           issues, such as availability of the router.
>    
> => this is true only because you take all your examples from
> the mobility world, not from the multi-homing one which is
> some years late compared to mobility. So IMHO your argument

Lets see.. hmm... you are right that I was thinking too
much about the mobility world. But on the other hand,
do we have a multihoming protocol _right now_ that
does this? I think SCTP does it, but that would limit
the ability of MOBIKE to survive problems on the path
only if SCTP was used -- which seems pretty hard requirement
to me. Plus it wouldn't work with SGWs as far as I can
see, because there wouldn't be any SCTP in the endpoints.

I happen to know also that the MULTI6 protocol that is being
worked on includes will include a new protocol for this
purpose. But like SCTP, it only works as an integral
part of MULTI6, its not a standalone protocol. Plus
it doesn't work for IPv4, despite my requests to make
it so :-(

> is wrong and there will be an external mechanism which is able
> to find another pair that works, ...

All I was saying is that there isn't one now :-) I forgot
SCTP, but OTOH that doesn't work for everything. And I'm
not aware of anyone developing a protocol that would cover
all the main requirements, and be usable together with
MOBIKE. But you are right -- this could change.

--Jari
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.