Re: New issue 18: Threat discussion

Francis Dupont wrote:
>  In your previous mail you wrote:
> 
>       3) Unauthenticated attacker causes the IKE_SA to be
>          closed by modifying just one or two IKE packets (if
>          attacker can modify all packets, he can of course DoS).
>    
> => I have a concern with this because it is not a MOBIKE threat
> but an IKE one. I propose to rewrite it, adding for example
> that MOBIKE should not add a new vulnerability (i.e., MOBIKE
> should be as resillient as IKE, BTW this should be easy to do).

Ok. Do you have suggested text?

--Jari