Re: Some thoughts about "path failover"

> Another thing I would like to bring up is that I would think this
> "path failover" with RR should only be done when necessary e.g. if
> an INFO-EXCH of address update is received, I would think there is
> no need for RR in this case.

Absent something like an owner-of-address certificate infrastracture
we need to do RR tests to prevent a malicious client from tricking a
high volume sender (e.g., video-on-demand server) into DoSing a third
party.

						- Bill