Re: issue 12: interaction with other protocols doing RR
Vijay Devarapalli <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I think I pressed "send" before completing the second point > I would rather add an RR test to Mobile IP. It could be a > simple Mobility Header message probe protected by IPsec. > a couple of reasons. > 1. I am not sure we are going to be using MOBIKE between > a MN and HA (when they are already doing Mobile IPv6 > signaling. BU is your MOBIKE update message). > 2. no need to have some kind of interaction between the > IKE stack and the Mobile IPv6 stack no need to have some kind of interaction between the IKE stack and the Mobile IPv6 stack for RR test. > > Vijay > _______________________________________________ > Mobike mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.machshav.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mobike