Re: issue 6: scope of SA changes

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   I think we have consensus on this.
   
=> no, you don't or you have a strange idea of what is a consensus...
(at least not mine :-)

   Some of us see a possible need for an optional
   mechanism that is capable of treating some flows
   in different manner than others. But it appears
   that IKE SA based mechanisms are sufficient, i.e.,
   no need to build specific IPsec SA treatment into
   the protocol.
   
=> I disagree, in fact expressed opinions at your exception are
all about the mobile context, not the multi-homing or the SCTP contexts.

Regards

[email protected]