Re: issue 12: interaction with other protocols doing RR
Jari Arkko <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Organization | None |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Vijay Devarapalli wrote: > I would rather add an RR test to Mobile IP. It could be a > simple Mobility Header message probe protected by IPsec. > a couple of reasons. > 1. I am not sure we are going to be using MOBIKE between > a MN and HA (when they are already doing Mobile IPv6 > signaling. BU is your MOBIKE update message). > 2. no need to have some kind of interaction between the > IKE stack and the Mobile IPv6 stack Yes, this is indeed another (and pretty good) alternative! But stating in the MOBIKE document that the results of the RR test are usable by "applications" leaves this choice to you (or the MIP6 WG). --Jari