Re: issue 12: interaction with other protocols doing RR

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   > 1. I am not sure we are going to be using MOBIKE between
   >     a MN and HA (when they are already doing Mobile IPv6
   >     signaling. BU is your MOBIKE update message).
   > 2. no need to have some kind of interaction between the
   >     IKE stack and the Mobile IPv6 stack
   
   I think it would be useful to compare the two solutions.
   
   I have not read your IKEv2 for MIP draft, but I am interested to know if
   some of the backdoor API changes in IPsec mentioned in RFC 3776 could be
   removed if the HA and MN support MOBIKE. Do you think this would be
   possible?
   
=> Jak, it seems you missed an important point: Mobile IPv6 and
MOBIKE are two *incompatible* solutions for the same problem (if
you restrict things to IPv6 mobility without optimization).

Regards

[email protected]