Re: issues 18, 15, 6 -- return routability
Jari Arkko <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] wrote: >I think we came to agreement on when we can skip the test >completely (by default, do the check; fancier authorization >is possible but does not have to be standardized). But what > > Yes. >about the before/after moving the traffic part? > > There was a proposal in [1] with some support from [2] and [3], a related other question in [4], no opposition, but not a whole lot of discussion. But maybe this is in fact enough. Unless you see a significant technical issue, perhaps we should stick with the proposal, which was "do it before (if done at all)". [1] http://www.machshav.com/pipermail/mobike/2005-March/000692.html [2] http://www.machshav.com/pipermail/mobike/2005-March/000706.html [3] http://www.machshav.com/pipermail/mobike/2005-March/000708.html [4] http://www.machshav.com/pipermail/mobike/2005-March/000694.html --Jari