| Newsgroups |
gmane.ietf.mobike |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
Tero Kivinen writes:
> It is possible, the protocol just needs to be written so it
> supports it. If you want to get it working with IKEv2 NAT-T
> you need to add modify the NAT-T behavior when using MOBIKE
> little more (You need to modify the NAT-T behavior in all
> cases)
>
<snip>
>
> Then you simply say that only N(MOVE TRAFFIC) is the only
> method of updating the addresses. I.e. disable dynamic
> updating of IKEv2 NAT-T (it is already allowed as dynamic
> update is SHOULD not MUST).
Ok, reading this and your previous messages, I think I finally
understood what you meant.. Yes, it seems that this can be made
to work (but IMHO it's much more complicated than a separate
path test message).
Best regards,
Pasi