Re: issue 11 -- window size

[email protected] wrote:

>Ok, reading this and your previous messages, I think I finally
>understood what you meant.. Yes, it seems that this can be made
>to work (but IMHO it's much more complicated than a separate
>path test message).
>  
>
Good, so we have two window=1 alternatives. The
problem that we have, however, is that we've only got
one that is described in a very detailed manner, i.e.
what you Pasi have in MOPO. But I talked to Tero and he
promised to write up a more detailed proposal about
this at some point. So I would suggest that we conclude
this issue, for now -- the discussion seems to converge
on some window=1 alternative, as far as I can see.

--Jari