Re: issue 34 proposal
Francis Dupont <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In your previous mail you wrote: [email protected] writes: > there is one situation where "dynamic updates" has clear > advantage: voice. Dynamic updates survives much faster > than IKE approach and call would stay up. NAT rebooting will cause probably tens of seconds or even minutes of network lossage anyways, so that will normally cause people to break the connection and try to reconnect before that. I think most of my friends will usually allow about 2-10 seconds of bad connection in gsm phone, before they will hang up and redial trying to fix the problem. Most of the NATs boot much slower than that. => here NAT rebooting includes NAT loosing its state and unfortunately this kind of events is more frequent and fast. Another case of causing NAT mapping disappearing is the too long keepalive, but that should not really matter in VoIP traffic, as there is traffic going on fast enough to keep the NAT mappings up. => another case so there still are other cases... Regards [email protected] PS: please don't forget that NAT traversal is explicitely outside the WG charter.