Re: about draft-ietf-mobike-protocol-01.txt (issue 40)

Francis Dupont <[email protected]> Thu, 08 Sep 2005 17:34:02 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.mobike
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   Right. But what I'm missing still is a statement somewhere
   in the document that says we can have multiple IKE SAs
   in parallel and that if there's MOBIKE-related changes
   then those changes apply only to the IKE SA on which
   those changes were communicated. This may be obvious,
   but I think its good to write it down anyway.

=> yes, if we'd like to kill multihoming it is better to dig a grave (:-).

   >I do not agree. We just chose to implement multihoming support 
   >in a slightly different way than SCTP did.

   Yes. And I believe what we are doing matches
   well with our charter, too.

=> I strongly object: only a part of the charter matches, and I am not
talking about the NAT traversal stuff which does match but a forbidden
part.

Regards

[email protected]