Re: about draft-ietf-mobike-protocol-01.txt (issue 40)

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   It should include the 2401bis model too when applicable, but it can
   also provide other implementation instructions.

=> I agree with this conclusion including its keywords.
   
   We do support multihoming, we do not support simultaneous use of
   multiple addresses (as it would be load balacing that was explictly
   forbidden by the charter).

=> I can't see why you believe that multiple addresses implies load
balancing, so I can't understand why you miss the fact that multiple
addresses is the way multihoming is handled in IPv6.

   We do allow traffic to move from one interface to the another (that
   is not mobility, it is multihoming).

=> this is not multihomong, it is a small and not essential part of
what is called multihoming (which is fortunately defined at the IETF,
cf MULTI6 WG & its successor(s)).

Regards

[email protected]