RE: issue 34 proposal
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jari Arkko wrote: > > Tero Kivinen wrote: > > >So perhaps we should say you MUST NOT do automatic update with IKEv2 > >packets (breaks the probing), but you MAY do it for ESP packets? > > > > > This would work for me (and the complexity cost would be > only on those implementations that actually do the MAY). Sounds reasonable to me as well. Best regards, Pasi