RE: issue 34 proposal
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <13E3DA8B48E17D4C96D261A36A23FCD68E4BA6@xmb-rtp-208.amer.cisco.com> |
Just to clarify... If one does detect NAT change at ESP layer, what does one do? Do we do a return routability check on the new address before updating it's SADB? It would seem logical, but just want to make sure we're on the same page. Stephane. > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > [email protected] > Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 7:23 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Mobike] issue 34 proposal > > Jari Arkko wrote: > > > > Tero Kivinen wrote: > > > > >So perhaps we should say you MUST NOT do automatic update > with IKEv2 > > >packets (breaks the probing), but you MAY do it for ESP packets? > > > > > > > > This would work for me (and the complexity cost would be > only on those > > implementations that actually do the MAY). > > Sounds reasonable to me as well. > > Best regards, > Pasi > _______________________________________________ > Mobike mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.machshav.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mobike >