RE: issue 34 proposal

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mobike
Message-ID <13E3DA8B48E17D4C96D261A36A23FCD68E4BA6@xmb-rtp-208.amer.cisco.com>
Just to clarify...

If one does detect NAT change at ESP layer, what does one do?

Do we do a return routability check on the new address before updating
it's SADB?  It would seem logical, but just want to make sure we're on
the same page.

Stephane. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 7:23 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Mobike] issue 34 proposal
> 
> Jari Arkko wrote:
> > 
> > Tero Kivinen wrote:
> > 
> > >So perhaps we should say you MUST NOT do automatic update 
> with IKEv2 
> > >packets (breaks the probing), but you MAY do it for ESP packets?
> > >  
> > >
> > This would work for me (and the complexity cost would be 
> only on those 
> > implementations that actually do the MAY).
> 
> Sounds reasonable to me as well.
> 
> Best regards,
> Pasi
> _______________________________________________
> Mobike mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.machshav.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mobike
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.