Francis Dupont wrote:
> => I find something strange: when I signaled the issue to
> Mobile IP folks (the issue is common to signalings with NAT
> traversal), they changed immediately their specs to mitigate
> the issue (cf RFC 3519). When I signal it to IPsec folks, it
> seems it is not a real issue. Usually, arrogance is more for
> French guys... So, please do what is needed, and don't believe
> I'll try to delay IKEv2 with this (i.e., now it is a Mobike
> issue).
I'm curious, how exactly does RFC 3519 mitigate this issue?
Best regards,
Pasi
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.