Re: Issue 41: Mandate NAT prevention if not doing NAT-T?

Francis Dupont <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mobike
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
 In your previous mail you wrote:

   To me it looks like IKEv2 w/tunnel mode IPsec could work through
   "Basic-NAT-PT" type v4/v6 translation [RFC2766] (even if the
   implementations don't support IKEv2 NAT-T).
   
   (But I haven't gone through all the details.)
   
=> for instance how the NAT-PT translates the inner header (:-).

[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.