Re: Issue 41: Mandate NAT prevention if not doing NAT-T?

Francis Dupont wrote:
>  In your previous mail you wrote:
> 
>    Are transient traffic redirection attacks serious enough to warrant it?
> 
> => you miss the point: the attack is transient, not the traffic redirection.

In the MIPv4 context the traffic redirection is also transient.
When the MN rebinds, the redirection ends.  Now, if there is no
equivalent mechanism in MOBIKE, the attack is more serious, but
from previous mails it seems that this aspect is covered?

-Sami