Re: Issue 41: Mandate NAT prevention if not doing NAT-T?
Francis Dupont <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
First attempt: IKE uses addresses it runs over, taken from IP headers, as endpoint addresses for IPsec SAs it establishes. If the addresses are left unprotected, an attacker can redirect the IPsec traffic to a third party just modifying the IP header of some IKE messages. Either NAT_DETECTION_*_IP or NO_NATS_ALLOWED detect the modification of the IP header on the path, including this attack. Regards [email protected]