ID regarding interactions of IPSec encryption devices and mobile-ip (and other protocols)
William D Ivancic <[email protected]> Wed, 06 Aug 2003 08:37:54 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipsec,gmane.ietf.mobileip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
During my work with mobile-ipv4 mobile router code and deployment in operational networks, We have ran across a number of problems that had to be resolved. Also, during my last trip to IETF (San Francisco), there was much talk in mobile-ip, NEMO and IPSec on the need for these groups to understand each others issues and workings as securing mobile users and networks is ..... challenging (nasty). I wrote this draft in hopes of highlighting some of the issues and hopefully preventing others from banging their head against the walls trying to figure out why things don't work. Also, the NSA is currently working on a specification similar to IPSec and needs to understand some of these issues if they want to use such devices in mobile environments. Any suggestions on improving this document would be greatly appreciated. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ivancic-layer3-encryptors-00.txt Abstract This document describes some issues related to performing encryption at layer-3. In particular, routing protocol problems may result if the time-to-live (TTL) field in IPv4 or the Hop Limit field in IPv6 is decremented once before encapsulation [1][2]. Also, special provisions may be necessary within the encryptor devices if broadcast messages are to transition the encryptor pairs. Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU) issues are also presented. Will Ivancic