Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hoon-mobileip-undad-00.txt
"Youn-Hee Han" <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Oct 2003 10:37:26 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobileip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <004a01c399cf$620c2930$3d2f024b@YounHeeHan> |
JaeHoon wrote: > Hi, Greg > > Thanks a lot for your interest in our draft. > > I have a question about following sentence. > > The ping ff02::1 won't work. > > Existing hosts don't have to respond to the message. > > FF02::1 is already reserved in RFC. > And futhermore, I could not find that some host may not respond to ff02::1 > in any RFC due to firewall. > Let me know reliable reference. > I usally used ff02::1 or ff02::2 in our lab and ETSI test event. > I just have been confused in what you mentioned. Such ping request/response can be blocked not based on address filtering but service filtering. - Youn-Hee