| Newsgroups |
gmane.ietf.mta-filters |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
> > And such messages can and often do contain part or all of the original
> > message, creating exactly the issue I've been talking about.
> So we're back to this then.
This has been the issue from the start.
> Do you also object to websites saying "404 not found"
> while still logging the fact that you tried to look at a resource?
Nope. But the situations are not remotely comparable. No users involved, just
for starters.
> Sometimes you want to keep the junk that was sent to you while saying to the
> sender that nobody got that message. Making that hard within the standard will
> just cause people to work around it by doing things like capturing all mail that
> hits the MXes before sieve processes it. Not providing a facility because it can be
> used to lie doesn't change that.
As I said before, if you really think it's perfectly OK to provide a mechanism
to your users that allows them to instruct the system to lie in an offical
system message about them not having gotten the content of a mail message, then
we have nothing further to talk about.
Ned
_______________________________________________
sieve mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve